Moral Foundations — Why Good People Reach Opposite Conclusions
Two people read the same dilemma and reach completely opposite conclusions — each convinced the other is missing something obvious. Moral Foundations Theory proposes that this happens because they're reasoning from different psychological systems: Care, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority, Sanctity, Liberty. The dilemmas below activate these foundations in ways that reveal which ones are running your deepest moral reasoning. Neither response is wrong. They're different moral languages.
Vote on this dilemma
A runaway trolley is heading toward 5 people. You can pull a lever to divert it — but it will kill 1 person instead.
1 votes cast
Research background
Jonathan Haidt and colleagues developed Moral Foundations Theory to explain cross-cultural variation in moral intuitions. The framework identifies six foundational systems — Care, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority, Sanctity, Liberty — each with evolutionary origins and contemporary moral weight. Liberal and conservative moral systems differ primarily in how heavily the non-Care/Fairness foundations are weighted.
- Moral Psychology Research Lab — University of Virginia / NYU
- The Righteous Mind — Jonathan Haidt (Pantheon Books, 2012)
SplitVote is for entertainment and aggregate insight, not a scientific test.
Related dilemmas
You are a juror. Every piece of evidence says guilty — but your gut tells you the defendant is innocent. The jury must be unanimous.
Your best friend asks if you like their new partner. You think the partner is terrible for them.
Vaccines are 99% effective and safe. Should they be legally mandatory for school attendance, even for parents with religious objections?
A city offers to eliminate all violent crime by installing 24/7 AI surveillance on every street corner and public space.
Related topics
No account required. Your vote is anonymous.