← All dilemmas
🕊️freedom
A government program offers you a permanent neural interface that creates a subjectively perfect life — rich relationships, purpose, joy — while your body is sustained in a pod. Outside, civilization is irreversibly collapsing and your participation in the real world would make no measurable difference. Do you plug in?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These choices ask how much risk a society should accept so people can decide for themselves. Choosing “Accept the simulation: live a genuinely fulfilling existence rather than endure a collapsing world where your suffering changes nothing” prioritises fewer restrictions now; choosing “Refuse the simulation: remain in harsh reality, preserving the authenticity of lived experience even if it means pain and futility” gives more weight to fewer regrets later.
Worth asking yourself
- Whose freedom does this protect, and whose does it cost?
- Would you accept the rule if it applied to you?
More Freedom Dilemmas
- Governments can prevent terrorist attacks by reading everyone's private messages — but there will be zero privacy. No exceptions.
- A politician spreads false claims that lead to harassment and violence in some communities. Should they be permanently banned from all major platforms?
- Vaccines are 99% effective and safe. Should they be legally mandatory for school attendance, even for parents with religious objections?
- A city offers to eliminate all violent crime by installing 24/7 AI surveillance on every street corner and public space.