← All dilemmas
🏙️society
An influencer with 5M followers promotes an unproven diet that hospitalizes a fan. Should they face legal consequences or only public accountability?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Public-good questions surface the trade-offs that aggregate numbers usually hide. Choosing “Legal liability: influencers who profit from harmful advice should face enforceable consequences like any professional” prioritises broader fairness; choosing “Public accountability only: regulating speech sets a precedent that chills free expression and personal responsibility” gives more weight to concrete impact on individuals.
Worth asking yourself
- Are we solving the problem or moving it?
- What does this say about what we collectively value?
More Society Dilemmas
- A 90% one-time wealth tax on billionaires could end world hunger for 10 years. Billionaires would still be comfortably rich.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?