← All dilemmas
🤖technology
Facing a crisis of teen suicide linked to online platforms, a lawmaker must decide between holding tech giants accountable or preserving the open nature of the internet. Is the potential for saving lives worth the risk of stifling freedom of expression?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Technology rarely asks for permission once it works, so the ethics has to land before deployment. Choosing “Make social media companies legally liable to force them to implement stricter, life-protecting content moderation” prioritises the capability it unlocks; choosing “Protect the companies from liability to avoid excessive censorship and maintain a platform for diverse voices” gives more weight to the agency it costs.
Worth asking yourself
- Could you reverse the choice if it backfired?
- Does ease here come at someone else’s expense?
More Technology Dilemmas
- An AI generates a masterpiece painting with no human creative input. Who owns the copyright?
- A self-driving car's brakes fail. It must choose: swerve into a barrier (killing the passenger) or hit a pedestrian who jaywalked.
- Scientists can upload your consciousness to a computer perfectly. Your biological body must die in the process. Is the digital version still you?
- You can permanently delete all social media from existence. The world becomes slower and less connected, but global mental health improves 40%.