← All dilemmas
🤖technology
Scientists confirm your unborn child carries a gene guaranteeing a painful, fatal disease by age 30. You can genetically edit the embryo to eliminate it — but the same gene cluster also shapes traits like empathy and creativity that make your child uniquely who they will be. Do you edit?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Tech dilemmas push convenience and capability against privacy, agency and risk. Choosing “Edit the embryo to remove the fatal disease, accepting that you are also reshaping who your child would have naturally become” prioritises speed and reach; choosing “Leave the genome untouched, honoring the child's natural identity while knowing they will face suffering and an early death” gives more weight to oversight and consent.
Worth asking yourself
- Who benefits from this, and who absorbs the risk?
- Could you reverse the choice if it backfired?
More Technology Dilemmas
- An AI generates a masterpiece painting with no human creative input. Who owns the copyright?
- A self-driving car's brakes fail. It must choose: swerve into a barrier (killing the passenger) or hit a pedestrian who jaywalked.
- Scientists can upload your consciousness to a computer perfectly. Your biological body must die in the process. Is the digital version still you?
- You can permanently delete all social media from existence. The world becomes slower and less connected, but global mental health improves 40%.