← All dilemmas
🏙️society
Should companies be legally forced to disclose their emissions even if it drives them out of business and kills local jobs?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Public-good questions surface the trade-offs that aggregate numbers usually hide. Choosing “Yes — the public's right to environmental truth outweighs any company's survival” prioritises broader fairness; choosing “No — mandatory disclosure without transition support punishes workers, not polluters” gives more weight to concrete impact on individuals.
Worth asking yourself
- Are we solving the problem or moving it?
- What does this say about what we collectively value?
More Society Dilemmas
- A 90% one-time wealth tax on billionaires could end world hunger for 10 years. Billionaires would still be comfortably rich.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?