← All dilemmas
🤖technology
Should governments be permitted to bypass encryption on private devices and networks to stop a confirmed, imminent terrorist threat when explicit consent is impossible to obtain?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Tech dilemmas push convenience and capability against privacy, agency and risk. Choosing “Yes, to protect innocent lives by preventing mass casualties” prioritises speed and reach; choosing “No, to preserve digital privacy and prevent normalization of unwarranted surveillance” gives more weight to oversight and consent.
Worth asking yourself
- What would you give up to keep this capability?
- Who benefits from this, and who absorbs the risk?
More Technology Dilemmas
- An AI generates a masterpiece painting with no human creative input. Who owns the copyright?
- A self-driving car's brakes fail. It must choose: swerve into a barrier (killing the passenger) or hit a pedestrian who jaywalked.
- Scientists can upload your consciousness to a computer perfectly. Your biological body must die in the process. Is the digital version still you?
- You can permanently delete all social media from existence. The world becomes slower and less connected, but global mental health improves 40%.