← All dilemmas
🤖technology
Social media platforms connect millions of teens but can also host harmful content. Should these companies be held legally accountable when a teen's suicide is linked to content they hosted?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Every new capability quietly removes a previous choice — the question is whether that trade is worth it. Choosing “Yes, because it creates a critical financial incentive for companies to proactively design safer platforms and remove harmful content” prioritises what the system makes easy; choosing “No, because it would lead to excessive censorship and shift the fundamental responsibility for teen safety away from parents and communities” gives more weight to what it makes invisible.
Worth asking yourself
- Who benefits from this, and who absorbs the risk?
- Could you reverse the choice if it backfired?
More Technology Dilemmas
- An AI generates a masterpiece painting with no human creative input. Who owns the copyright?
- A self-driving car's brakes fail. It must choose: swerve into a barrier (killing the passenger) or hit a pedestrian who jaywalked.
- Scientists can upload your consciousness to a computer perfectly. Your biological body must die in the process. Is the digital version still you?
- You can permanently delete all social media from existence. The world becomes slower and less connected, but global mental health improves 40%.