← All dilemmas
🤖technology
Accetteresti un chip neurale che aumenta le tue capacità cognitive del 30% sapendo che il produttore potrebbe monitorare in tempo reale ogni tuo pensiero, pur senza alterarlo?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Technology rarely asks for permission once it works, so the ethics has to land before deployment. Choosing “Accetto il chip, migliorando le mie prestazioni cognitive in cambio di una parziale rinuncia alla privacy mentale” prioritises the capability it unlocks; choosing “Rifiuto il chip, preservando la mia intimità mentale ma rinunciando a un significativo vantaggio competitivo” gives more weight to the agency it costs.
Worth asking yourself
- What would you give up to keep this capability?
- Who benefits from this, and who absorbs the risk?
More Technology Dilemmas
- An AI generates a masterpiece painting with no human creative input. Who owns the copyright?
- A self-driving car's brakes fail. It must choose: swerve into a barrier (killing the passenger) or hit a pedestrian who jaywalked.
- Scientists can upload your consciousness to a computer perfectly. Your biological body must die in the process. Is the digital version still you?
- You can permanently delete all social media from existence. The world becomes slower and less connected, but global mental health improves 40%.