← All dilemmas
⚖️morality
Durante una tragedia collettiva, postare sui social per informare aiuta davvero, o trasforma il dolore altrui in contenuto?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
This is a right-vs-right question: every choice respects one value while sacrificing another. Choosing “Postare è legittimo: informare, testimoniare e sensibilizzare ha valore anche nel dolore” prioritises the cleaner moral line; choosing “Il silenzio digitale è rispetto: usare la tragedia per visibilità è sempre inappropriato” gives more weight to the smaller real-world cost.
Worth asking yourself
- What cost are you more willing to accept?
- Which value should matter more here?
More Morality Dilemmas
- A runaway trolley is heading toward 5 people. You can pull a lever to divert it — but it will kill 1 person instead.
- You discover a cure for cancer, but it only works if you keep the formula secret — sharing it would destroy the compound's effectiveness forever.
- A pill erases all your painful memories — but also the lessons you learned from them. You become happier but more naive.
- Your child is dying and needs medicine you cannot afford. You could steal it. The store owner is not evil — just running a business.