← All dilemmas
⚖️morality
Durante un'emergenza, scopri che le autorità diffondono dati falsi per evitare il panico. Cosa fai?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Moral dilemmas like this expose a gap between what feels principled and what feels workable. Choosing “Taci: la disinformazione controllata limita il panico e salva vite nel breve termine” prioritises consistency with one rule; choosing “Riveli la verità al pubblico, accettando il rischio di caos e conseguenze legali” gives more weight to attention to specific consequences.
Worth asking yourself
- What cost are you more willing to accept?
- Which value should matter more here?
More Morality Dilemmas
- A runaway trolley is heading toward 5 people. You can pull a lever to divert it — but it will kill 1 person instead.
- You discover a cure for cancer, but it only works if you keep the formula secret — sharing it would destroy the compound's effectiveness forever.
- A pill erases all your painful memories — but also the lessons you learned from them. You become happier but more naive.
- Your child is dying and needs medicine you cannot afford. You could steal it. The store owner is not evil — just running a business.