← All dilemmas
🤖technology
È lecito creare un clone umano per salvare una vita, sapendo che il clone avrà coscienza propria e non potrà scegliere il suo destino?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Tech dilemmas push convenience and capability against privacy, agency and risk. Choosing “Sì: il diritto alla vita del malato supera il rischio di creare un essere non consenziente” prioritises speed and reach; choosing “No: nessuna vita vale la creazione di un essere senziante destinato a esistere come mezzo” gives more weight to oversight and consent.
Worth asking yourself
- What would you give up to keep this capability?
- Who benefits from this, and who absorbs the risk?
More Technology Dilemmas
- An AI generates a masterpiece painting with no human creative input. Who owns the copyright?
- A self-driving car's brakes fail. It must choose: swerve into a barrier (killing the passenger) or hit a pedestrian who jaywalked.
- Scientists can upload your consciousness to a computer perfectly. Your biological body must die in the process. Is the digital version still you?
- You can permanently delete all social media from existence. The world becomes slower and less connected, but global mental health improves 40%.