← All dilemmas
🤖technology
Gestisci una comunità online di supporto emotivo. Chiudere la piattaforma migliorerebbe la salute mentale della maggioranza, ma isolerebbe chi non ha altri legami.
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Every new capability quietly removes a previous choice — the question is whether that trade is worth it. Choosing “Chiudi la piattaforma: il danno collettivo supera il beneficio individuale” prioritises what the system makes easy; choosing “La mantieni aperta: non puoi abbandonare chi dipende da essa come unico rifugio” gives more weight to what it makes invisible.
Worth asking yourself
- What would you give up to keep this capability?
- Who benefits from this, and who absorbs the risk?
More Technology Dilemmas
- An AI generates a masterpiece painting with no human creative input. Who owns the copyright?
- A self-driving car's brakes fail. It must choose: swerve into a barrier (killing the passenger) or hit a pedestrian who jaywalked.
- Scientists can upload your consciousness to a computer perfectly. Your biological body must die in the process. Is the digital version still you?
- You can permanently delete all social media from existence. The world becomes slower and less connected, but global mental health improves 40%.