← All dilemmas
🤖technology
Le autorità cittadine propongono di utilizzare l'analisi predittiva dei dati di sorveglianza per identificare potenziali criminali, ma questo richiede il monitoraggio costante di tutti i cittadini. Accetti di sacrificare la tua privacy per una sicurezza collettiva ipotetica?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Every new capability quietly removes a previous choice — the question is whether that trade is worth it. Choosing “Sì, perché la prevenzione dei crimini giustifica la sorveglianza di massa per proteggere la comunità” prioritises what the system makes easy; choosing “No, perché il diritto alla privacy e alla presunzione di innocenza sono valori fondamentali che non possono essere violati” gives more weight to what it makes invisible.
Worth asking yourself
- Does ease here come at someone else’s expense?
- What would you give up to keep this capability?
More Technology Dilemmas
- An AI generates a masterpiece painting with no human creative input. Who owns the copyright?
- A self-driving car's brakes fail. It must choose: swerve into a barrier (killing the passenger) or hit a pedestrian who jaywalked.
- Scientists can upload your consciousness to a computer perfectly. Your biological body must die in the process. Is the digital version still you?
- You can permanently delete all social media from existence. The world becomes slower and less connected, but global mental health improves 40%.