← All dilemmas
🕊️freedom
Lo Stato dovrebbe imporre limiti legali giornalieri al tempo trascorso sui social media per proteggere il benessere psicologico dei cittadini?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Liberty and safety are both costs, not just benefits — every line drawn pays for the other. Choosing “Sì: la salute mentale collettiva vale più della libertà individuale di scorrere infinitamente” prioritises personal freedom; choosing “No: decidere quanto tempo passare online spetta solo all'individuo, non allo Stato” gives more weight to collective safety.
Worth asking yourself
- Whose freedom does this protect, and whose does it cost?
- Would you accept the rule if it applied to you?
More Freedom Dilemmas
- Governments can prevent terrorist attacks by reading everyone's private messages — but there will be zero privacy. No exceptions.
- A politician spreads false claims that lead to harassment and violence in some communities. Should they be permanently banned from all major platforms?
- Vaccines are 99% effective and safe. Should they be legally mandatory for school attendance, even for parents with religious objections?
- A city offers to eliminate all violent crime by installing 24/7 AI surveillance on every street corner and public space.