← All dilemmas
🤝loyalty
Sei un comandante militare con un ordine di ritirata: per salvare i tuoi soldati dall'accerchiamento, devi dirigere un attacco distraente verso un'area civile nemica, sapendo che causerà vittime innocenti.
🌍 Join 1 people who already voted
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
When loyalty and truth pull in opposite directions, both sides feel like betrayal. Choosing “Esegui l'attacco distraente, sacrificando alcuni civili nemici per garantire la salvezza dei tuoi soldati” prioritises standing by someone you know; choosing “Rifiuti l'ordine, evitando vittime civili ma mettendo a rischio la vita della tua unità durante la ritirata” gives more weight to siding with a rule you believe in.
Worth asking yourself
- Would you accept the same call against you?
- Where does loyalty stop being a virtue?
More Loyalty Dilemmas
- Your closest friend is about to quit their job, sell their apartment, and move abroad for a 4-month-old relationship. They ask you honestly: 'Do you think I'm making a mistake?'
- You discover your closest friend committed a serious financial crime — embezzling from a charity. Do you turn them in?
- Your partner accidentally ran a red light and killed a pedestrian. They panic and beg you to drive away. No cameras saw you.
- Your sibling confides they've been cheating on their spouse for 2 years. The spouse is also your close friend.