← All dilemmas
🕊️freedom
Un governo propone di tracciare e moderare preventivamente i discorsi online che potrebbero alimentare estremismi, sacrificando parte della libertà di espressione per la sicurezza collettiva. Dovresti sostenere questa misura?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These choices ask how much risk a society should accept so people can decide for themselves. Choosing “Sì, perché la prevenzione della radicalizzazione protegge il bene comune e previene danni sociali irreparabili” prioritises fewer restrictions now; choosing “No, perché il controllo preventivo dei discorsi mina le fondamenta della democrazia e può essere abusato per silenziare voci scomode” gives more weight to fewer regrets later.
Worth asking yourself
- Whose freedom does this protect, and whose does it cost?
- Would you accept the rule if it applied to you?
More Freedom Dilemmas
- Governments can prevent terrorist attacks by reading everyone's private messages — but there will be zero privacy. No exceptions.
- A politician spreads false claims that lead to harassment and violence in some communities. Should they be permanently banned from all major platforms?
- Vaccines are 99% effective and safe. Should they be legally mandatory for school attendance, even for parents with religious objections?
- A city offers to eliminate all violent crime by installing 24/7 AI surveillance on every street corner and public space.