← All dilemmas
🤖technology
Un laboratorio potrebbe creare cloni umani geneticamente compatibili per fornire organi perfetti a pazienti in condizioni disperate, salvando vite ma trattando essenzialmente una forma di vita umana come un serbatoio di ricambi.
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Every new capability quietly removes a previous choice — the question is whether that trade is worth it. Choosing “Accettare la clonazione come un male necessario per salvare vite umane che altrimenti non avrebbero speranza” prioritises what the system makes easy; choosing “Rifiutare la clonazione, ritenendo che ridurre un essere umano—anche in fase embrionale—a mezzo per un altro violi i principi fondamentali della dignità umana” gives more weight to what it makes invisible.
Worth asking yourself
- Who benefits from this, and who absorbs the risk?
- Could you reverse the choice if it backfired?
More Technology Dilemmas
- An AI generates a masterpiece painting with no human creative input. Who owns the copyright?
- A self-driving car's brakes fail. It must choose: swerve into a barrier (killing the passenger) or hit a pedestrian who jaywalked.
- Scientists can upload your consciousness to a computer perfectly. Your biological body must die in the process. Is the digital version still you?
- You can permanently delete all social media from existence. The world becomes slower and less connected, but global mental health improves 40%.