← All dilemmas
🕊️freedom
Un'opera d'arte finanziata dallo Stato offende profondamente una minoranza religiosa. Il museo vuole tenerla esposta. Cosa dovrebbe prevalere?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Liberty and safety are both costs, not just benefits — every line drawn pays for the other. Choosing “La libertà artistica: lo Stato non può censurare l'arte che finanzia, anche se provoca” prioritises personal freedom; choosing “Il rispetto delle comunità: i fondi pubblici non devono sostenere ciò che ferisce i cittadini” gives more weight to collective safety.
Worth asking yourself
- Is the safer option also the more honest one?
- Whose freedom does this protect, and whose does it cost?
More Freedom Dilemmas
- Governments can prevent terrorist attacks by reading everyone's private messages — but there will be zero privacy. No exceptions.
- A politician spreads false claims that lead to harassment and violence in some communities. Should they be permanently banned from all major platforms?
- Vaccines are 99% effective and safe. Should they be legally mandatory for school attendance, even for parents with religious objections?
- A city offers to eliminate all violent crime by installing 24/7 AI surveillance on every street corner and public space.