← All dilemmas
🥩morality
You've seen the footage from industrial farms — the confinement, the standardized suffering behind cheap meat. Nothing forces your hand: you can afford alternatives, and plant-based options are everywhere. Knowing what you know, do you keep eating meat?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
This is a right-vs-right question: every choice respects one value while sacrificing another. Choosing “Keep eating it. Humans have always eaten animals, and one person's diet won't change an industry” prioritises the cleaner moral line; choosing “Give it up. Once you know how the animal lived and died, paying for it makes you complicit” gives more weight to the smaller real-world cost.
Worth asking yourself
- Would you defend this choice to someone affected by it?
- Is the principle worth the concrete cost?
More Morality Dilemmas
- A runaway trolley is heading toward 5 people. You can pull a lever to divert it — but it will kill 1 person instead.
- You discover a cure for cancer, but it only works if you keep the formula secret — sharing it would destroy the compound's effectiveness forever.
- A pill erases all your painful memories — but also the lessons you learned from them. You become happier but more naive.
- Your child is dying and needs medicine you cannot afford. You could steal it. The store owner is not evil — just running a business.