← All dilemmas
🌲society
Gli habitat a rischio dovrebbero essere protetti anche se le case diventano più costose?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Public-good questions surface the trade-offs that aggregate numbers usually hide. Choosing “Sì. L’estinzione è permanente” prioritises broader fairness; choosing “No. La casa è un bisogno immediato” gives more weight to concrete impact on individuals.
Worth asking yourself
- What does this say about what we collectively value?
- Whose interests should count more here, and why?
More Society Dilemmas
- A 90% one-time wealth tax on billionaires could end world hunger for 10 years. Billionaires would still be comfortably rich.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?