← All dilemmas
🌲society
Un incendio dovrebbe bruciare naturalmente, ma ci sono case vicine. Intervieni?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These choices are rarely between good and bad — they are between different distributions of harm. Choosing “Sì. Prima si proteggono le persone” prioritises rules that hold everyone the same; choosing “No. Spegnere ogni incendio peggiora quelli futuri” gives more weight to choices that account for difference.
Worth asking yourself
- Whose interests should count more here, and why?
- Would you accept the outcome from the losing side?
More Society Dilemmas
- A 90% one-time wealth tax on billionaires could end world hunger for 10 years. Billionaires would still be comfortably rich.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?