← All dilemmas
🌲society
Should national parks limit visitors by lottery to prevent damage?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Society dilemmas ask whose costs and whose voices count when no one wins everything. Choosing “Yes. Fragile places need strict limits” prioritises long-term system health; choosing “No. Public land should not become a privilege lottery” gives more weight to short-term relief for some.
Worth asking yourself
- Are we solving the problem or moving it?
- What does this say about what we collectively value?
More Society Dilemmas
- A 90% one-time wealth tax on billionaires could end world hunger for 10 years. Billionaires would still be comfortably rich.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?