← All dilemmas
🌲society
I parchi nazionali dovrebbero limitare i visitatori con lotteria per evitare danni?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These choices are rarely between good and bad — they are between different distributions of harm. Choosing “Sì. I luoghi fragili hanno bisogno di limiti severi” prioritises rules that hold everyone the same; choosing “No. La terra pubblica non deve diventare un privilegio a sorteggio” gives more weight to choices that account for difference.
Worth asking yourself
- Are we solving the problem or moving it?
- What does this say about what we collectively value?
More Society Dilemmas
- A 90% one-time wealth tax on billionaires could end world hunger for 10 years. Billionaires would still be comfortably rich.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?