← All dilemmas
🧳society
Gli affitti brevi portano turisti e reddito, ma i vicini perdono case e tranquillità. La città dovrebbe limitarli?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Society dilemmas ask whose costs and whose voices count when no one wins everything. Choosing “Sì. Le case dovrebbero servire prima ai residenti” prioritises long-term system health; choosing “No. I proprietari dovrebbero usare la proprietà come vogliono” gives more weight to short-term relief for some.
Worth asking yourself
- What does this say about what we collectively value?
- Whose interests should count more here, and why?
More Society Dilemmas
- A 90% one-time wealth tax on billionaires could end world hunger for 10 years. Billionaires would still be comfortably rich.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?