← All dilemmas
🎟️freedom
Un parco dà accesso prioritario a persone con disabilità invisibili. Alcuni visitatori pensano che il sistema sia abusato. Serve una prova?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These choices ask how much risk a society should accept so people can decide for themselves. Choosing “Sì. La fiducia va protetta dagli abusi” prioritises fewer restrictions now; choosing “No. Chiedere prove umilia chi ha bisogno di aiuto” gives more weight to fewer regrets later.
Worth asking yourself
- Is the safer option also the more honest one?
- Whose freedom does this protect, and whose does it cost?
More Freedom Dilemmas
- Governments can prevent terrorist attacks by reading everyone's private messages — but there will be zero privacy. No exceptions.
- A politician spreads false claims that lead to harassment and violence in some communities. Should they be permanently banned from all major platforms?
- Vaccines are 99% effective and safe. Should they be legally mandatory for school attendance, even for parents with religious objections?
- A city offers to eliminate all violent crime by installing 24/7 AI surveillance on every street corner and public space.