← All dilemmas
🧫morality
Se sistemi di organi coltivati in laboratorio fossero dimostrati privi di consapevolezza, dovrebbero sostituire la sperimentazione animale e aumentare gli organi disponibili?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
This is a right-vs-right question: every choice respects one value while sacrificing another. Choosing “Sì. Ridurre sofferenza e salvare vite lo giustifica” prioritises the cleaner moral line; choosing “No. Coltivare sistemi simili al corpo umano come strumenti supera un limite morale” gives more weight to the smaller real-world cost.
Worth asking yourself
- Is the principle worth the concrete cost?
- What cost are you more willing to accept?
More Morality Dilemmas
- A runaway trolley is heading toward 5 people. You can pull a lever to divert it — but it will kill 1 person instead.
- You discover a cure for cancer, but it only works if you keep the formula secret — sharing it would destroy the compound's effectiveness forever.
- A pill erases all your painful memories — but also the lessons you learned from them. You become happier but more naive.
- Your child is dying and needs medicine you cannot afford. You could steal it. The store owner is not evil — just running a business.