← All dilemmas
🛰️freedom
Una città sotto ripetuti attacchi di droni e missili può usare sistemi di difesa autonomi, più rapidi degli esseri umani ma capaci di sbagliare bersaglio. Dovrebbe usarli?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These choices ask how much risk a society should accept so people can decide for themselves. Choosing “Sì. Una difesa più rapida può salvare civili subito” prioritises fewer restrictions now; choosing “No. Le decisioni di vita o morte devono restare umane” gives more weight to fewer regrets later.
Worth asking yourself
- How much risk is the freedom worth?
- Is the safer option also the more honest one?
More Freedom Dilemmas
- Governments can prevent terrorist attacks by reading everyone's private messages — but there will be zero privacy. No exceptions.
- A politician spreads false claims that lead to harassment and violence in some communities. Should they be permanently banned from all major platforms?
- Vaccines are 99% effective and safe. Should they be legally mandatory for school attendance, even for parents with religious objections?
- A city offers to eliminate all violent crime by installing 24/7 AI surveillance on every street corner and public space.