← All dilemmas
🔥society
Gli atleti dovrebbero poter rifiutare di giocare con caldo pericoloso senza sanzioni?
🌍 Join 1 people who already voted
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Public-good questions surface the trade-offs that aggregate numbers usually hide. Choosing “Sì. Nessun contratto deve superare la salute” prioritises broader fairness; choosing “No. Devono decidere i medici, non i singoli giocatori” gives more weight to concrete impact on individuals.
Worth asking yourself
- Would you accept the outcome from the losing side?
- Are we solving the problem or moving it?
More Society Dilemmas
- A one-time wealth tax would fund 10 years of food aid to the people who need it most. Billionaires would still be billionaires.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?