← All dilemmas
🔥society
Gli atleti dovrebbero poter rifiutare di giocare con caldo pericoloso senza sanzioni?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Public-good questions surface the trade-offs that aggregate numbers usually hide. Choosing “Sì. Nessun contratto deve superare la salute” prioritises broader fairness; choosing “No. Devono decidere i medici, non i singoli giocatori” gives more weight to concrete impact on individuals.
Worth asking yourself
- Would you accept the outcome from the losing side?
- Are we solving the problem or moving it?
More Society Dilemmas
- A 90% one-time wealth tax on billionaires could end world hunger for 10 years. Billionaires would still be comfortably rich.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?