← All dilemmas
🕶️freedom
Un forum di supporto per adolescenti protegge minori vulnerabili grazie all'anonimato, ma l'anonimato rende più difficile far rispettare i limiti d'età. Dovrebbe restare anonimo?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Freedom dilemmas weigh personal autonomy against collective protection. Choosing “Sì. Alcuni ragazzi hanno bisogno di spazi privati per chiedere aiuto” prioritises the right to choose; choosing “No. Le regole di sicurezza valgono poco se nessuno sa chi è davvero presente” gives more weight to the duty to protect others.
Worth asking yourself
- Whose freedom does this protect, and whose does it cost?
- Would you accept the rule if it applied to you?
More Freedom Dilemmas
- Governments can prevent terrorist attacks by reading everyone's private messages — but there will be zero privacy. No exceptions.
- A politician spreads false claims that lead to harassment and violence in some communities. Should they be permanently banned from all major platforms?
- Vaccines are 99% effective and safe. Should they be legally mandatory for school attendance, even for parents with religious objections?
- A city offers to eliminate all violent crime by installing 24/7 AI surveillance on every street corner and public space.