← All dilemmas
🏛️society
A serious offender finishes a long sentence and walks free. Should they be allowed to live in your neighbourhood without you being told?
🌍 Join 2 people who already voted
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Public-good questions surface the trade-offs that aggregate numbers usually hide. Choosing “Yes. If they've served their time, the punishment can't follow them forever” prioritises broader fairness; choosing “No. The people nearby have a right to know what risk they are being asked to accept” gives more weight to concrete impact on individuals.
Worth asking yourself
- Would you accept the outcome from the losing side?
- Are we solving the problem or moving it?
More Society Dilemmas
- A one-time wealth tax would fund 10 years of food aid to the people who need it most. Billionaires would still be billionaires.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?