← All dilemmas
🌍society
Would you accept higher energy prices if it reduced the risk of a wider war?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These choices are rarely between good and bad — they are between different distributions of harm. Choosing “Pay more for energy to lower escalation risk” prioritises rules that hold everyone the same; choosing “Demand cheaper energy, even if pressure rises” gives more weight to choices that account for difference.
Worth asking yourself
- Are we solving the problem or moving it?
- What does this say about what we collectively value?
More Society Dilemmas
- A one-time wealth tax would fund 10 years of food aid to the people who need it most. Billionaires would still be billionaires.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?