← All dilemmas
📊society
Il risultato di un dilemma è affascinante, ma rischia di semplificare una questione dolorosa. La piattaforma dovrebbe diffonderlo molto?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Society dilemmas ask whose costs and whose voices count when no one wins everything. Choosing “Sì. Il disaccordo pubblico merita di essere visto chiaramente” prioritises long-term system health; choosing “No. Alcuni risultati hanno bisogno di contesto prima della viralità” gives more weight to short-term relief for some.
Worth asking yourself
- What does this say about what we collectively value?
- Whose interests should count more here, and why?
More Society Dilemmas
- A 90% one-time wealth tax on billionaires could end world hunger for 10 years. Billionaires would still be comfortably rich.
- Completely open borders between all countries — anyone can live and work anywhere without restrictions.
- Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
- All drugs are legalized, taxed, and regulated — removing the black market entirely. Portugal's model shows crime drops 50%. Do you support it?