Every adult receives €1,500/month from the government. Taxes for the top 20% double. Do you support it?
0 votes worldwide
Not enough votes yet to show a result.
Vote on this dilemma
You haven't voted on this one yet — cast your choice and see how it splits.
Vote now →Read the expert analysisSociology
This pairs an unconditional poverty fix (€1,500/month to every adult) with a financing model that doubles taxes on the top 20%. Both pieces are real — the disagreement isn't about whether either works in isolation, but whether the combination produces a healthier society or a less productive one. Empirical evidence is mixed; both sides have studies they can cite.
Why people split
One side treats no-strings income as decoupling survival from labor — the case for is that work is valuable, but having to work to eat distorts every other choice. The other treats unconditional income as removing a behavioral lever — the case against is that work delivers more than money (purpose, structure, contribution).
Educational perspective, not professional advice.
Send via messages, stories, or copy link
Was this dilemma interesting?
⚡ Challenge a friend!
Send them the link — they'll see your result only after they vote.
More share optionsInstagram, TikTok, X, WhatsApp, Discord, Telegram, story card
📱 Share as Story
Download a 9:16 card for Instagram Stories or TikTok.
Auto-posting is not available from the web. Upload the PNG manually.
What the split says
Public-good questions surface the trade-offs that aggregate numbers usually hide. Once votes come in, this section will show how voters weigh broad fairness against concrete impact.
Worth asking yourself
- Whose interests should count more here, and why?
- Would you accept the outcome from the losing side?