The choices you make in hypothetical dilemmas expose the moral architecture you actually operate by — not the one you think you have.

Moral Psychology Test: What Do Your Choices Reveal

Most of us believe we know our own values. We say we care about fairness, loyalty, honesty — and we mean it. But moral psychology research has shown, repeatedly, that what people say they believe and what they actually do when forced to choose can be strikingly different things. Dilemmas are not tricks or riddles. They are controlled situations designed to isolate the factors that drive moral judgment — whether you weight outcomes, duties, relationships, or gut instinct. On SplitVote, each scenario puts you at a genuine crossroads where both paths carry a real cost, and your response tells you something that no personality questionnaire can. Vote on a dilemma, see how tens of thousands of other people reasoned through the same choice, and find out where your moral compass actually points.

Vote on this dilemma

A runaway trolley is heading toward 5 people. You can pull a lever to divert it — but it will kill 1 person instead.

Pull the leverDo nothing
Pull the lever71%
Do nothing29%

7 votes cast

Research background

Jonathan Haidt at NYU and Joshua Greene at Harvard have independently shown that moral intuitions are faster and more emotion-driven than classical rational-choice theory predicts — Greene's dual-process model distinguishes automatic "deontological" gut reactions from slower utilitarian deliberation. Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory further identifies six universal moral dimensions (care, fairness, loyalty, authority, sanctity, liberty) that explain variation in moral judgment across cultures and political groups.

SplitVote is for entertainment and aggregate insight, not a scientific test.

Keep voting

Explore more dilemmas and see how the world is split.

No account required. Your vote is anonymous.