← All dilemmas
🌊survival
Preferiresti vivere 60 anni in piena salute fisica e mentale, sfruttando al massimo le tue capacità, o 90 anni con crescenti limitazioni che ti permetterebbero però di assistere alle tappe fondamentali delle generazioni future?
🌍 Join 1 people who already voted
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These questions test what you would actually do, not what sounds good in the abstract. Choosing “Scegliere 60 anni di perfetta salute, vivendo ogni momento con intensità e autonomia” prioritises immediate safety; choosing “Scegliere 90 anni con qualità di vita ridotta, garantendosi più tempo per guidare e vedere crescere figli e nipoti” gives more weight to long-term cost.
Worth asking yourself
- Could you live with the outcome you skipped?
- Who pays the price you avoid?
More Survival Dilemmas
- A lifeboat holds 8. There are 9 of you. Nobody volunteers. Someone proposes the eldest goes — they look at you and nod.
- You can go back in time and kill one person as a baby — preventing a genocide that kills 10 million people. The baby is innocent.
- A plane is going down. There are 6 survivors but only 4 parachutes. You have one. Do you give yours up or keep it?
- Your group of 13 reaches a fortified shelter — already occupied by 8 strangers at capacity. They refuse to open. Your group includes children. You could force the door; they have no weapons.