← All dilemmas
🛢️survival
I governi dovrebbero sovvenzionare backup fossili per l’AI se le rinnovabili non bastano rapidamente?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These questions test what you would actually do, not what sounds good in the abstract. Choosing “Sì. Il calcolo strategico richiede backup affidabile” prioritises immediate safety; choosing “No. L’AI non deve giustificare nuovi vincoli fossili” gives more weight to long-term cost.
Worth asking yourself
- What cost are you more willing to accept?
- Could you live with the outcome you skipped?
More Survival Dilemmas
- A lifeboat holds 8 people maximum. There are 9 survivors. Someone must go overboard or everyone drowns.
- You can go back in time and kill one person as a baby — preventing a genocide that kills 10 million people. The baby is innocent.
- A plane is going down. There are 6 survivors but only 4 parachutes. You have one. Do you give yours up or keep it?
- In a zombie apocalypse, your group finds a fortified shelter with supplies for 10. There are 15 of you. You hold the only key.