← All dilemmas
🚨survival
Should foreign governments fund shelters directly when military aid is politically blocked?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These questions test what you would actually do, not what sounds good in the abstract. Choosing “Yes. Humanitarian protection should not wait for politics” prioritises immediate safety; choosing “No. Aid should remain coordinated through official defense policy” gives more weight to long-term cost.
Worth asking yourself
- Could you live with the outcome you skipped?
- Who pays the price you avoid?
More Survival Dilemmas
- A lifeboat holds 8 people maximum. There are 9 survivors. Someone must go overboard or everyone drowns.
- You can go back in time and kill one person as a baby — preventing a genocide that kills 10 million people. The baby is innocent.
- A plane is going down. There are 6 survivors but only 4 parachutes. You have one. Do you give yours up or keep it?
- In a zombie apocalypse, your group finds a fortified shelter with supplies for 10. There are 15 of you. You hold the only key.