← All dilemmas
🤖justice
An AI sentencing tool is more consistent than human judges across similar cases, but cannot explain its reasoning. Should it be used?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Justice questions ask whether the law, fairness, or mercy should lead the call. Choosing “Yes. Consistency itself is a form of fairness” prioritises equal treatment for all; choosing “No. A sentence you can't be told the reason for isn't justice” gives more weight to proportionate response to one case.
Worth asking yourself
- Does context excuse the act, or just explain it?
- Who is the rule protecting, and who is paying for it?
More Justice Dilemmas
- A new tax would halve the income of the top 1% and double the income of the bottom 20%. The total wealth in society stays the same.
- You are a juror. Every piece of evidence says guilty — but your gut tells you the defendant is innocent. The jury must be unanimous.
- DNA evidence exonerates an innocent person after 25 years on death row. The real killer is 85, frail, and dying. Do they go to prison?
- Someone who destroyed your life 10 years ago is now a changed, successful person helping their community. They never apologized.