← All dilemmas
⚖️justice
A chronic bully shows genuine remorse and asks for one last chance. Expelling them protects victims — but ruins their future. What do you do?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Justice questions ask whether the law, fairness, or mercy should lead the call. Choosing “Expel them. The victims' safety and dignity cannot be compromised for the bully's benefit” prioritises equal treatment for all; choosing “Keep them enrolled with strict conditions. Redemption is possible, and exclusion rarely heals anyone” gives more weight to proportionate response to one case.
Worth asking yourself
- Does context excuse the act, or just explain it?
- Who is the rule protecting, and who is paying for it?
More Justice Dilemmas
- A new tax would halve the income of the top 1% and double the income of the bottom 20%. The total wealth in society stays the same.
- An AI sentencing tool is more consistent than human judges across similar cases, but cannot explain its reasoning. Should it be used?
- You are a juror. Every piece of evidence says guilty — but your gut tells you the defendant is innocent. The jury must be unanimous.
- DNA evidence exonerates an innocent person after 25 years on death row. The real killer is 85, frail, and dying. Do they go to prison?