← All dilemmas
⚖️justice
Is offering financial incentives to homeless individuals for medical trial participation a just way to provide them with income and access to healthcare, or does it exploit their vulnerability by leveraging desperation for potentially risky research?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Justice questions ask whether the law, fairness, or mercy should lead the call. Choosing “Yes, it provides crucial financial support and healthcare access to a marginalized group while advancing medical science” prioritises equal treatment for all; choosing “No, it preys on economic desperation and risks coercion, undermining the principle of informed consent” gives more weight to proportionate response to one case.
Worth asking yourself
- Who is the rule protecting, and who is paying for it?
- Is mercy a kind of justice here, or its opposite?
More Justice Dilemmas
- A new tax would halve the income of the top 1% and double the income of the bottom 20%. The total wealth in society stays the same.
- An AI sentencing tool is more consistent than human judges across similar cases, but cannot explain its reasoning. Should it be used?
- You are a juror. Every piece of evidence says guilty — but your gut tells you the defendant is innocent. The jury must be unanimous.
- DNA evidence exonerates an innocent person after 25 years on death row. The real killer is 85, frail, and dying. Do they go to prison?