← All dilemmas
⚖️justice
You are on a parole board deciding the fate of a reformed murderer. The victim's family insists justice requires full punishment, while all experts confirm the offender's remorse and rehabilitation.
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
These dilemmas put rules and circumstances against each other and demand a verdict. Choosing “Grant early release, honoring the proven redemption and the goal of rehabilitation” prioritises the letter of the law; choosing “Deny early release, upholding the original sentence as justice owed to the victims” gives more weight to the spirit behind it.
Worth asking yourself
- Does context excuse the act, or just explain it?
- Who is the rule protecting, and who is paying for it?
More Justice Dilemmas
- A new tax would halve the income of the top 1% and double the income of the bottom 20%. The total wealth in society stays the same.
- An AI sentencing tool is more consistent than human judges across similar cases, but cannot explain its reasoning. Should it be used?
- You are a juror. Every piece of evidence says guilty — but your gut tells you the defendant is innocent. The jury must be unanimous.
- DNA evidence exonerates an innocent person after 25 years on death row. The real killer is 85, frail, and dying. Do they go to prison?