← All dilemmas
⚖️justice
You must cut one role. Same salary, same team. One person outperforms but has no dependents. The other struggles but supports three kids. Who goes?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Justice questions ask whether the law, fairness, or mercy should lead the call. Choosing “Let go the lower performer — output is the fairest measure of professional value” prioritises equal treatment for all; choosing “Let go the higher performer — their resilience outweighs a metric; the other's need is real” gives more weight to proportionate response to one case.
Worth asking yourself
- Who is the rule protecting, and who is paying for it?
- Is mercy a kind of justice here, or its opposite?
More Justice Dilemmas
- A new tax would halve the income of the top 1% and double the income of the bottom 20%. The total wealth in society stays the same.
- An AI sentencing tool is more consistent than human judges across similar cases, but cannot explain its reasoning. Should it be used?
- You are a juror. Every piece of evidence says guilty — but your gut tells you the defendant is innocent. The jury must be unanimous.
- DNA evidence exonerates an innocent person after 25 years on death row. The real killer is 85, frail, and dying. Do they go to prison?