← All dilemmas
⚖️justice
Hai prove credibili ma incomplete che un vicino abbia aggredito qualcuno. Avverti pubblicamente il quartiere o aspetti conferme ufficiali?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Justice questions ask whether the law, fairness, or mercy should lead the call. Choosing “Avverti subito il quartiere: proteggere le persone viene prima della certezza” prioritises equal treatment for all; choosing “Aspetti le indagini: diffamare senza prove certe può distruggere un innocente” gives more weight to proportionate response to one case.
Worth asking yourself
- Is mercy a kind of justice here, or its opposite?
- Would you apply the same standard to yourself?
More Justice Dilemmas
- A new tax would halve the income of the top 1% and double the income of the bottom 20%. The total wealth in society stays the same.
- An AI sentencing tool is more consistent than human judges across similar cases, but cannot explain its reasoning. Should it be used?
- You are a juror. Every piece of evidence says guilty — but your gut tells you the defendant is innocent. The jury must be unanimous.
- DNA evidence exonerates an innocent person after 25 years on death row. The real killer is 85, frail, and dying. Do they go to prison?