← All dilemmas
⚖️justice
Sei a conoscenza che un medico compassionevole, in segreto, aiuta pazienti terminali in condizioni disumane a porre fine alle loro sofferenze, anche senza un consenso formale documentato.
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Justice questions ask whether the law, fairness, or mercy should lead the call. Choosing “Denunci il medico, difendendo il principio sacro del consenso informato e l'integrità della legge” prioritises equal treatment for all; choosing “Rimani in silenzio, riconoscendo che in casi estremi l'umanità può prevalere sui protocolli” gives more weight to proportionate response to one case.
Worth asking yourself
- Would you apply the same standard to yourself?
- Does context excuse the act, or just explain it?
More Justice Dilemmas
- A new tax would halve the income of the top 1% and double the income of the bottom 20%. The total wealth in society stays the same.
- An AI sentencing tool is more consistent than human judges across similar cases, but cannot explain its reasoning. Should it be used?
- You are a juror. Every piece of evidence says guilty — but your gut tells you the defendant is innocent. The jury must be unanimous.
- DNA evidence exonerates an innocent person after 25 years on death row. The real killer is 85, frail, and dying. Do they go to prison?