← All dilemmas
⚖️justice
Un algoritmo scarta il tuo CV perché hai avuto un gap lavorativo per motivi di salute. L'azienda non lo sa. Cosa fai?
Vote to reveal how SplitVote voters split.
YOUR CHOICE
OR
Anonymous voting. No account required. Results update in real time.
Why this dilemma matters
Justice questions ask whether the law, fairness, or mercy should lead the call. Choosing “Accetti la decisione algoritmica: le regole valgono per tutti, anche se ingiuste nel tuo caso” prioritises equal treatment for all; choosing “Contatti direttamente un responsabile umano, bypassando il sistema automatizzato” gives more weight to proportionate response to one case.
Worth asking yourself
- Does context excuse the act, or just explain it?
- Who is the rule protecting, and who is paying for it?
More Justice Dilemmas
- A new tax would halve the income of the top 1% and double the income of the bottom 20%. The total wealth in society stays the same.
- An AI sentencing tool is more consistent than human judges across similar cases, but cannot explain its reasoning. Should it be used?
- You are a juror. Every piece of evidence says guilty — but your gut tells you the defendant is innocent. The jury must be unanimous.
- DNA evidence exonerates an innocent person after 25 years on death row. The real killer is 85, frail, and dying. Do they go to prison?