Situational Dilemmas — What You'd Really Do When No One Is Watching
A coworker takes credit for your idea. A friend cheats on a test and beats an honest candidate. You're the one who has to decide whether to bend a rule for someone who deserves it. Situational dilemmas are the everyday choices where two right things collide: honesty and loyalty, fairness and care, the moment and the precedent. They have no correct answer and measure no aptitude — they're a way to see how you actually reason when the stakes are real but small, and to compare your gut with people who chose the opposite. Pick a side, see how the vote splits, and ask yourself why.
Vote on this dilemma
In a meeting, a coworker presents your idea as their own and the boss is impressed. Speaking up now means contradicting them in front of everyone.
Research background
Research on judgment in realistic situations studies how people actually choose when small everyday value conflicts arise, not how they say they would. These scenarios are built for reflection and discussion: they are not a psychometric test, a diagnosis, or a personnel-selection tool.
SplitVote is for entertainment and aggregate insight, not a scientific test.
Related dilemmas
You're the manager. A reliable employee asks you to bend a clear rule for a genuine family emergency — but granting it sets a precedent others will expect.
Your best friend cheats on a competitive exam and wins a place that an honest stranger just lost. Only you saw it happen.
You spot a coworker's mistake that will quietly harm customers. No one else has noticed, and flagging it will get your colleague in serious trouble.
You're offered the promotion you've worked years for — on one condition: you must lay off a teammate you respect and who has done nothing wrong.
A teammate did almost none of the work but will share the same credit and grade as everyone else. The person assessing you is about to decide.
Related topics
No account required. Your vote is anonymous.